Leading Musculoskeletal Injury Care
AdobeStock_171323618.jpg

Scholarly Activities

Research Activities

Creating a 3D Reconstruction of the Glenohumeral Joint from an MRI to Assist in Surgical Decision Making — MHSRS 2023

Dowe JN, Bradley MW, Dickens JF

Abstracted accepted for a poster session at the 2023 Military Health System Research Symposium

Musculoskeletal injuries are some of the most prevalent issues in the military, being a significant contributor to functional limitations, duty restrictions, and impaired military readiness. In particular, shoulder instability events, such as dislocations and subluxations, are a disproportionately burdensome condition among military Service Members (SM), with SM being 20 times more likely to experience a shoulder instability event than their civilian counterparts. Furthermore, a common consequence of instability events is bone loss to the glenohumeral joint, which increases risk of re-injury (currently around 80% re-injury rate). As the amount of bone loss increases, so do the failure rates following nonoperative and operative treatment, leading to recurrent instability that contributes to inferior long-term outcomes and impaired biomechanics. With the military population being the most at-risk population for shoulder instability injuries, understanding the unique anatomical structure of a patient’s shoulder joint is essential in advancing treatment and surgical decision making. Additionally, the high costs associated with these injuries highlights the need for enhanced management and care. Imaging modalities, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT), are used to assess the extent of injury in patients who experience shoulder instability. These assessments help guide decisions regarding the direction of care for patients. However, these imaging modalities each have certain advantages and disadvantages in analyzing a patient’s joint structure. Currently, the closest to a gold standard for assessing bone loss in the shoulder is by obtaining a three-dimensional (3D) CT scan and then utilizing a 3D reconstruction. Though valuable, the current evaluation process can be improved to provide more efficiency and ease from both a clinician and patient perspective. The process of obtaining a 3D view of the shoulder joint from an MRI, although less common, can be completed to effectively assess bone loss and determine treatment, while also solving some of the issues associated with the use of CT.