Defoor m, cognetti d, bedi a, carmack d, arner j, defroda s, enrat j, frangiamore s, nuelle c, sheean a

To determine whether low resilience is predictive of worse patient-reported outcomes (PROs) or diminished improvements in clinical outcomes after joint preserving and arthroscopic surgery.

A comprehensive search of PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Science Direct was performed on September 28, 2022, for studies investigating the relationship between resilience and PROs after arthroscopic surgery in accordance with the Preferred Reported Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines.

Patient resilience is inconsistently demonstrated to affect clinical outcomes associated with joint preserving and arthroscopic surgery. However, substantial limitations in the existing literature including underpowered sample sizes, lack of standardization in stratifying patients based on pretreatment resilience, and inconsistent collection of PROs throughout the continuum of care, diminish the strength of most conclusions that have been drawn.

DeFoor MT, Cognetti DJ, Bedi A, Carmack DB Jr, Arner JW, DeFroda S, Ernat JJ, Frangiamore SJ, Nuelle CW, Sheean AJ. Patient Resilience Does Not Conclusively Affect Clinical Outcomes Associated With Arthroscopic Surgery but Substantial Limitations of the Literature Exist. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2024 Feb 13;6(2):100812. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100812. PMID: 38379604; PMCID: PMC10877194.

Rhon D and Tucker C

Orthopaedic surgery has revolutionized the expectations for restoration of physical function after musculoskeletal injury and, along with physical therapy, has transformed the limits of recovery. Many orthopaedic procedures have a high success rate for improving quality of life and patient-reported outcomes, yet these procedures carry some level of risk, including postoperative complications. The stepped-care model of health care delivery, when applied to musculoskeletal care, recommends implementing less-intense and lower-risk treatments with known efficacy, such as promotion and education of self-management strategies and physical therapy, before more-invasive and higher-risk treatments such as surgery. This model of managing musculoskeletal disability can improve efficiency of care delivery and reduce medical costs at the health system level. Unfortunately, there is a documented lack of implementing an appropriate course of conservative care, especially physical therapy, prior to surgery across multiple orthopaedic disciplines including sports, spine, and trauma medicine and joint arthroplasty. Failure to respond to nonsurgical treatment has been suggested as a requisite component of the surgical appropriateness criteria, yet practical application can be elusive. Multiple barriers to adequate utilization of conservative treatment exist, including U.S. payment models that increase out-of-pocket expense for patients, negative patient perception of therapy, unreasonable patient expectations from therapy versus surgery, and communication barriers between patient, surgeon, and therapist. Surgeons should ensure that high-quality guidelineappropriate care is delivered early and adequately to their patients. Rehabilitation professionals have a responsibility to deliver high-value care, properly documenting the type and extent of treatment to improve surgical decision-making between surgeons and patients. Criteria to determine appropriateness for surgery should include a standardized and extensive assessment of failed therapies prior to certain elective surgeries. Improved collaboration between surgeons and rehabilitation professionals can result in improved outcomes for patients with musculoskeletal disorders.

Rhon, D. I., & Tucker, C. J. (2022). Nonoperative Care Including Rehabilitation Should Be Considered and Clearly Defined Prior to Elective Orthopaedic Surgery to Maximize Optimal Outcomes. Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2021.09.038