M bejar-chapa, n rossi, n king, d kostyra, m hussey, k mcguire, m randolph, r redmond, j winograd

Peripheral nerve injuries affect 13–23 per 100,000 people annually in the U.S. and often result in motor and sensory deficits. Microsurgical suture repair (SR) is the standard treatment but is technically challenging and associated with complications. Photochemical tissue bonding (PTB), which uses light and a photoactivated dye to bond collagenous tissues, offers a promising alternative. We compared PTB with commercially available collagen membranes for SR and PTB using cryopreserved human amnion (HAM) in a rat sciatic nerve transection model. In total, 75 Lewis rats underwent nerve repair with one of five methods: SR, PTB-HAM, PTB with commercial collagenous membranes (human amnion monolayer (AML), human amnion–chorion–amnion trilayer (ATL), or swine intestinal submucosa (SIS)). Functional recovery was assessed with walking tracks and the Static Sciatic Index (SSI) at days 30, 60, 90, and 120; histological evaluations at days 30 and 120 examined inflammation, axon density, and fascicle structure. No significant differences in SSI scores were found between groups, though PTB-AML and PTB-SIS improved over time. Histology showed inflammation at day 30 that decreased by day 120. Histomorphometry revealed similar axon regeneration across groups. These results suggest that PTB with commercial membranes is a viable alternative to SR.

Bejar-Chapa M, Rossi N, King NC, Kostyra DM, Hussey MR, McGuire KR, Randolph MA, Redmond RW, Winograd JM. Comparison of Photochemically Sealed Commercial Biomembranes for Nerve Regeneration. Journal of Functional Biomaterials. 2025; 16(2):50. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb16020050

n king, k mcguire, m bejar-chapa, y hoftiezer, m randolph, j winograd

Photochemical tissue bonding (PTB) is a technique for peripheral nerve repair in which a collagenous membrane is bonded around approximated nerve ends. Studies using PTB with cryopreserved human amnion have shown promising results in a rat sciatic nerve transection model including a more rapid and complete return of function, larger axon size, and thicker myelination than suture repair. Commercial collagen membranes, such as dehydrated amnion allograft, are readily available, offer ease of storage, and have no risk of disease transmission or tissue rejection. However, the biomechanical properties of these membranes using PTB are currently unknown in comparison to PTB of cryopreserved human amnion and suture neurorrhaphy.

Rat sciatic nerves (n = 10 per group) were transected and repaired using either suture neurorrhaphy or PTB with one of the following membranes: cryopreserved human amnion, monolayer human amnion allograft (crosslinked and noncrosslinked), trilayer human amnion/chorion allograft (crosslinked and noncrosslinked), or swine submucosa. Repaired nerves were subjected to mechanical testing.

During ultimate stress testing, the repair groups that withstood the greatest strain increases were suture neurorrhaphy (69 ± 14%), PTB with crosslinked trilayer amnion (52 ± 10%), and PTB with cryopreserved human amnion (46 ± 20%), although the differences between these groups were not statistically significant. Neurorrhaphy repairs had a maximum load (0.98 ± 0.30 N) significantly greater than all other repair groups except for noncrosslinked trilayer amnion (0.51 ± 0.27 N). During fatigue testing, all samples repaired with suture, or PTBs with either crosslinked or noncrosslinked trilayer amnion were able to withstand strain increases of at least 50%.

PTB repairs with commercial noncrosslinked amnion allograft membranes can withstand physiological strain and have comparable performance to repairs with human amnion, which has demonstrated efficacy in vivo. These results indicate the need for further testing of these membranes using in vivo animal model repairs.

King NC, McGuire KR, Bejar-Chapa M, Hoftiezer YAJ, Randolph MA, Winograd JM. Photochemical Tissue Bonding of Amnion Allograft Membranes for Peripheral Nerve Repair: A Biomechanical Analysis. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2024 Mar;40(3):232-238. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1772670. Epub 2023 Sep 11. PMID: 37696294.